Press and Media
View the latest AANEM Achievement Award winners, the American Neuromuscular Foundation (ANF) Abstract Award winners, and the latest AANEM news articles on News Express.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: When will be content of abstracts be viewable, as opposed to just the titles?
A: The abstract content will be available at the annual meeting during the Poster Hall hours. We do not provide abstract presenter information or slides ahead of time. All available information can be found in the AANEM Abstract Guide online when it becomes available.
Q: How do I reach out to abstract or session presenters for an interview?
A: We do not offer member contact information. To connect with abstract or session presenters, review the AANEM Annual Meeting Program when available. Find the topics of interest and connect with the presenter after their lecture or during their abstract poster session time. Currently there is no interview option for virtual attendees.
Q: When can I share information?
A: The embargo on the abstracts themselves is lifted when they have been published in Muscle & Nerve and online in the AANEM Abstract Guide. However, the additional information beyond what is in the abstract itself is still embargoed.
AANEM requires information that goes beyond that which is contained within the abstract, e.g., the release of data not included in the abstract, discussion of the abstract done as part of a scientific presentation, etc. to be embargoed until the start of the annual meeting. Please see the Abstract Embargo Policy.
Q: Will the Abstract Award Reception feature the best posters?
A: The Abstract Award Reception is a social hour in honor of the abstract award winners where all authors, including award winners, will be available to discuss research.
Q: Original research is ONLY presented as posters, correct?
A: Yes - the research is presented in the Poster Hall via abstract posters.
AANEM Comments on 2026 Proposed Update to Physician Fee Schedule & QPP
In the letter, AANEM acknowledged that the proposed payment increases following several years of cuts are appreciated but stressed that the changes do not keep pace with practice costs and inflation. Other major areas of concern included a proposed “efficiency adjustment” that would reduce payments for many procedures, as well as a planned overhaul of practice expense calculations that risks undercompensating facility-based services. AANEM called on CMS to base major payment changes on robust, specialty-specific data and to avoid abrupt reductions that could threaten small or independent practices.
Looking forward, AANEM remains concerned that physician payment policies are not sustainable without structural reform and continues to urge CMS and Congress to pursue permanent, inflation-based payment updates to secure long-term stability for physicians. AANEM strongly supports efforts to expand telehealth access, simplify quality reporting, and ensure flexibility for neuromuscular specialists within MIPS and QPP, and continues to advocate for quality measures and payment models that reflect the realities of subspecialty – and often consultative – care.
As always, AANEM welcomes continued dialogue with CMS, and remains committed to advocating for evidence-based, equitable payment policies. For more detail, view AANEM’s full comment letter here.