Sample Neuromuscular Ultrasound Report
Referralindication: Left popliteal fossa pain History and Physical Examination: Mr. Smith is a 46 year old male presenting with a 6 month history of progressive left popliteal fossa pain and tenderness. There is no history of prior trauma. He denies any weakness or numbness. Prior NCS/EMG Testing: Performed 6/30/2018 at the AANEM EMG Laboratory was normal. Significant PMHx: Results: Conclusion:
Patient name:Smith, John Referring provider: Doe, Jane Clinic Number: ABC123 Performing provider: Doe, Bill Date of Birth/Age: 46 years Date of study: 07/01/2018 Gender: Male Height: 72 inches Weight: 150 lbs Hand dominance: Right Ethinicity: African-American
Focused physical examination reveals pain to palpation in the left popliteal fossa without a palpable mass. There is normal muscle tone and bulk in the bilateral lower extremities. Strength is 5/5 and deep tendon reflexes are 2/4 bilaterally. Sensation is normal to pinprick and vibratory testing.
the bilateral lower extremities was performed with gain set at 75%, focusing on the fibular and tibial nerves. The nerves were imaged with the knee fully extended and the patient lying in a lateral decubitus position. The following cross-sectional area measurements were obtained and compared to reference values obtained in our laboratory.
Fibular Nerve Right CSA Left CSA Popliteal fossa (ref < 12mm2) 10.0mm2 15.0mm2 Fibular head (ref <12mm2) 9.8mm2 9.9mm2 Tibial Nerve Popliteal fossa (ref <25mm2) 23mm2 20mm2
The left fibular nerve is focally enlarged and hypoechoic within the mid popliteal fossa; the patient is quite tender to compression maneuvers at this location. In longitudinal view the fibular nerve has a fusiform shape, with large hypoechoic fascicles. Doppler imaging demonstrates increased vascularity within the nerve.
The left superficial fibular nerve could not be identified distal to the fibular head.The left distal sciatic nerve could not be visualized despite repeated attempts.
The left tibial and right tibial and fibular nerves had normal cross-sectional areas, with normal echogenicity in both the transverse and longitudinal planes.
Creation of New Guidelines, Consensus Statements, or Position Papers
AANEM members are encouraged to submit ideas for papers that can improve the understanding of the field. The AANEM will review nominated topics on the basis of the following criteria:- Members’ needs
- Prevalence of condition
- Health impact of condition for the individual and others
- Socioeconomic impact
- Extent of practice variation
- Quality of available evidence
- External constraints on practice
- Urgency for evaluation of new practice technology