Guidance for the Management of (MG) and (LEMS) During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of the Neurological Sciences
journal homepage:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-the-neurological-sciences

Clinical short communication

Guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) and LambertEaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic

International MG/COVID-19 Working Group1 , Saiju Jacoba,⁎,2, Srikanth Muppidib,⁎,2, Amanda Guidonc, Jeffrey Guptilld, Michael Hehire, James F. Howard Jrf, Isabel Illag, Renato Mantegazzah, Hiroyuki Muraii, Kimiaki Utsugisawaj, John Vissingk, Heinz Wiendll, Richard J. Nowakm,⁎,2

  1. Department of Neurology, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University Hospitals, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
  2. Department of Neurology, Stanford Neuroscience Health Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
  3. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
  4. Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
  5. Department of Neurology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
  6. Department of Neurology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7025, USA
  7. Catedràtica Neurologia U.A.B., Unitat Patologia Neuromuscular, Servei Neurologia, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, C/ Pare Claret 167, Barcelona 08025, Spain
  8. Department of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milano, Italy
  9. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan
  10. Department of Neurology, Hanamaki General Hospital, Japan
  11. Department of Neurology, 2082 Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
  12. Department of Neurology, Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
  13. Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a new illness caused by a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Symptoms are variable but typically include fever, cough, respiratory symptoms, diarrhea, reduction of smell and taste sensation. Severity ranges from mild to severe and the virus may lead to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome and death, in some patients. Nearly every country in the world has been affected by this virus and is currently defined as a pandemic, by the World Health Organization. There are no known proven therapies for treating this virus and no vaccine to prevent the infection at this time.

No data currently exist on how COVID-19 affects people with myasthenia gravis (MG)/LEMS or patients with other diseases on immunosuppressive therapies. However, because most patients with MG are on immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies and may also have respiratory muscle weakness, there is a theoretical concern that MG/LEMS patients may be at higher risk of contracting the infection or experiencing severe manifestations of COVID-19.

Individuals with MG and LEMS as well as treating physicians have asked for guidance on the use of therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. There are numerous recommendations circulating that attempt to provide clarity and guidance, however, differences among the recommendations have created confusion. Immunotherapy decision making varies significantly from country to country, ranging from highly provider-directed to a collaborative decision-making model. The advice below was developed by a panel of MG experts. We recognize that peer reviewed published literature regarding COVID-19 in MG or in immunocompromised patients to date is lacking.

The MG expert panel1 suggests that therapy decisions should be individualized and made collaboratively between the person with MG and his/her healthcare provider. Based on available information (23 March 2020), it is suggested that:
 

*Corresponding authors.
 E-mail addresses:   saiju.jacob@uhb.nhs.uk (S. Jacob), muppidis@stanford.edu (S. Muppidi), richard.nowak@yale.edu (R.J. Nowak).
1These recommendations have been prepared and endorsed by an international working group of MG experts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic on 23 March 2020. The American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) endorsed these recommendations on 25 March 2020.
2These authors contributed equally.
 ​https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.116803 Received 23 March 2020; Accepted 24 March 2020.
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 412 (2020) 116803
Available online 25 March 2020
0022-510X/ © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. T March 2020), it is suggested that:

 
1.People with MG should follow the corresponding national guidelines3 and any additional recommendations for people at risk for serious illnesses from COVID-19. 

Patients on existing therapies for MG/LEMS
 
2.MG/LEMS patients should continue their current treatment and are advised not to stop any existing medications, unless specifically discussed and approved by their healthcare provider.
 
3.There is no scientific evidence to suggest that symptomatic therapies like Pyridostigmine or 3, 4 Diaminopyridine increases the risk of infection and should not be discontinued unless there are other clinical reasons to do so.
 
4.Even though strong evidence is lacking, it is recommended that MG patients already on immunosuppressive medications4,5 should practice extra-vigilant social distancing, including avoiding public gatherings/crowds, avoiding crowded public transport and where possible use alternatives to face-to-face consultations (e.g., telemedicine), if clinically appropriate.
 
5.When altering or stopping an existing immunosuppressive therapy5 that carries a potential for increased disease activity and/or MG exacerbation or crisis, people with MG and their MG healthcare providers should consider specific risks (e.g., age, comorbid health conditions, location) and benefits.

Infusion therapies, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasma exchange
 
6.Certain infusion therapies in MG may require travel to hospitals or infusion centers and we strongly recommend that this decision be made based on regional incidence of COVID-19 and risk/benefit of the therapy for the individual patient. The healthcare provider should be able to give region-specific advice, and where possible consider switching to home infusion.
 
7.There is currently no evidence to suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG6 ) or therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX or TPE) carry any additional risk of contracting COVID-19. However, the use of IVIG has to be based on individual patient need and indiscriminate use should be avoided. In general, PLEX and IVIG should be reserved for patients with acute exacerbations. However, the panel recognize that there are some patients receiving these as maintenance therapy, who should continue these, but extra precautions may need to be taken because of the need for travel to and from a healthcare facility.
 
8.There is currently no evidence to support that targeted C5-complement inhibition using eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb), increases susceptibility to COVID-19 infection or its outcome.
 
3This list is not exhaustive, but only representative – please check for up to date guidance in each country/region:

• CDC guidelines, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html
• European CDC guidelines, https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19
• UK guidelines, https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus
• Australia, https://www.health.gov.au/
• Japan, https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/en/2019-ncov-e.html
4B-cell depleting therapies include: rituximab, ocrelizumab.
5Immunotherapies which on withdrawal carries potentially severe increase in disease activity, relapse, and exacerbation/crisis include: corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus and others.
6Immunodulatory therapies: IVIG/SCIG (intravenous immunoglobulin, subcutaneous immunoglobulin).

Blood tests for existing therapies
 
9.Weigh risks and benefits of routine blood monitoring at this time. Some of the MG therapies require frequent blood work monitoring and decisions regarding the ongoing need for testing, which requires patient to leave their home, should be individualized and based on regional COVID-19 incidence.

What to consider when starting an immune therapy in patients with MG/LEMS now?
 
10.Before starting a B-cell depleting therapy4 (e.g., rituximab), healthcare providers should consider the risk of worsening myasthenia or crisis and the risk of contracting the viral infection. It may be advisable to delay initiation of cell depleting therapies, until the peak of the outbreak is over in their region. However, the risk of not starting the cell depleting therapy in occasional patients may outweigh the risk of severe COVID-19 infection and this has to be discussed with the patient in detail.

Advice for patients in ongoing clinical trials
 
11.Currently there are many clinical trials in progress for MG and we strongly recommend that any decision regarding ongoing need for in-person evaluations and treatments under the clinical trial be based with consideration for patients' best interest. At present, there is no scientific evidence to suggest that terminal complement inhibitors or neonatal Fc Receptor blockers (FcRn) may increase the risk of contracting this viral infection, but the panel recommends extra precautions (as in point 4 above), to minimize the risk. This also would typically need to be discussed and approved by the study sponsor, instituitional review board, and medical monitor for clinical trials. Additionally, it should be in keeping with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidlelines. Is there reasonable evidence for medications treating COVID-19?
 
12.Various medications have been mentioned in the news and social media as being potentially useful to treat COVID-19 (e.g., choloroquin, azithromycin, anti-virals, etc.), however, these are not proven to be effective or studied systematically at this time and based only on anecdotal experience.

Should MG or LEMS patients go for vaccinations?
 
13.Vaccinations can protect for a variety of infections/pathogens. However, in the current situation it is recommended to only use dead vaccines in this patient group. There is no vaccine for COVID19 available at this time.

What if patients have already contracted COVID-19?
 
14.Most patients who develop COVID-19 have mild disease and should continue the current best practice standard of care for MG/LEMS. There might be a need to increase the dose of corticosteroids as in standard infection/stress steroid protocols. However, if the symptoms are severe (requiring hospitalization) it may be necessary to consider pausing current immunosuppression temporarily, especially if there is concurrent infections/sepsis. Immune depleting agents should not be given under such conditions, while standard immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine, mycophenolate) should probably be continued, since effects of dosing are longer lasting, drug wash-out takes longer and rebuilding of effects take several months.
 
15.Importantly, treatment escalation or change decisions need to be individualized based on the relative severity of COVID-19 infection and MG/LEMS in consultation with local expert(s).

We are continuing to monitor this quickly evolving situation and these recommendations may be modified as data becomes available.

As decisions regarding immunotherapy use should be individualized and made by the person with MG and his/her healthcare provider, we encourage that patients contact their MG provider with questions and for further guidance.
 

Creation of New Guidelines, Consensus Statements, or Position Papers
AANEM members are encouraged to submit ideas for papers that can improve the understanding of the field. The AANEM will review nominated topics on the basis of the following criteria:

  • Members’ needs
  • Prevalence of condition
  • Health impact of condition for the individual and others
  • Socioeconomic impact
  • Extent of practice variation
  • Quality of available evidence
  • External constraints on practice
  • Urgency for evaluation of new practice technology

Submit Your Idea