Join this vibrant community of professionals eager to exchange ideas, share resources, and engage in meaningful discussions. Use this platform as a sounding board to seek advice for navigating challenging cases or career decisions, and receive expert guidance from generous peers who want to help you succeed.
In order to comment on posts and view posts in their entirety, please login with your AANEM member account information.
I'm graduating pediatric rehabilitation fellowship this summer and will be starting my new job in the fall. An EMG machine is going to be purchased for me and I am being asked which one they should get. Any suggestions/insights into choosing a machine/software are greatly appreciated! I've use both Natus and Caldwell machines at various points during my training, slightly leaning toward Natus as I used it a lot during residency but it was a much older model.
Any things you wish you would have known when choosing a machine?
I will be working in NJ, have connected with a Caldwell rep, but if anyone knows a Natus rep there I could speak with please send their info!
I would like to collect the thoughts and opinions on the interpretation of jitter study/single-fiber EMG.
Short version: In an otherwise normal jitter/SFEMG study performed with disposable concentric needle electrode, does having 1 pair (out of 20) with increased jitter WITH blocking make the study abnormal? If so, I am looking for some literature supporting this statement. May be I am missing it while it is in plain sight. I need some help finding this info.
Long-version: Clinical history: 48-year-old African-American woman presenting with 15-year history of generalized weakness, 2 years of fatigable ptosis, 1 year of dysarthria, intermittent binocular diplopia, shortness of breath. Reports having exposure to Pyrethrin (organophosphate) since the age of 11. Neurological examination at the time of jitter/SFEMG study was only notable for some dysarthria but ocular and general motor examination was within normal limits.
Current medication regimen: IVIG q. monthly and mestinon with subjective improvement.
Prior work up: Underwent serological testing for myasthenia gravis X3 times. One of the times was noted to be positive for AchR modulating antibodies but on repetietion negative. Prior EMGs with repetitive nerve stimulation was negative. Also had a muscle biopsy reported to be normal.
She was evaluated by at least 4 different neurologists and our group is the fifth.
Jitter studies: Patient does not have any history of botulinum toxin. No more exposure to pyrethrin. She had been off pyridostigmine for more than 24 hours prior to her study.
Study was performed on the right frontalis muscle with voluntary activation using disposable concentric needle electrode. Data as documented in the tabular format, and videos.
Apart from the single pair that shows increased jitter with blocking, rest of the study is normal. From what I remember, having a block even in a single pair makes the study abnormal. But, I am not able to find any data supporting the statement. Here are my questions:
1. Is it commonly accepted that having a block (ofcourse with increased jitter) on a single pair makes the study abnormal ? Like I said before, I may be missing it in plain sight. If so, I would like to get some literature evidence to support the statement. I remember hearing this, but I also remember hearing other views.
2. If it is felt that this particular pair has a quality issue and should be excluded out of the analysis, in that case would like to understand why and what could have been done better.
Please note: This question is strictly related to interpretation of single-fiber EMG/jitter studies and would appreciate limiting the discussion towards electrodiagnostic interpretation rather than clinical.
Thank you in adavnce for your time and expertise.
Best,
Sri Raghav Sista, MBBS
Asst. Prof of Neurology - UTHouston
Hi all,
I was hoping to get some advice on an ultrasound finding. The patient is a 50-year-old quite muscular male with a history of prediabetes presenting with typical CTS symptoms. Symptoms and electrodiagnostic findings were much more prominent on the non-dominant left side. Left side DL/amp = 11.9ms/3.5mV, right side = 5.6ms/8.9mV. Ultrasound of the left median nerve at the distal wrist crease showed intrusion of the FDS muscle belly into the carpal tunnel when opening the hand and extending the fingers. On short axis, the muscle belly displaces and appears to compress the median nerve. Left median CSA was 24 mm2, right was 15 mm2. See youtube video link below. I was able to find a 2012 case report by Terasnoudis with similar findings but otherwise didn't see much in a pubmed search. I have not seen this before and am not certain about its incidence in general or its relationship to CTS. Does anyone have experience with this? How have you managed such patients?
Dear colleagues
I would be grateful for thoughts on the ulnar-mixed-fibres waveform (lowermost trace) across the elbow on the left.
Woman, mid-forties, good health.
Numbness affecting left hand, mostly ulnar half, suspected to be related (having followed) soft-tissue injury to the neck ten years earlier. Neck normal on imaging.
Referred specifically for the possibility of nerve entrapment in the cubital tunnel.
No wasting or weakness in the upper limbs.
Conduction mildly slow (43m/s) across elbow, and only in fascicles to FDI.
I have seen similar two-peaks waveforms in several ulnar elbow-neuropathies, and I would be grateful for your thoughts on whether the dissociated peaks do reflect pathology in a subset of the “mixed fibres”.
Hi all –
I'd like to open an interesting debate and get some input from experts here! In full disclosure, a few of us are working on a monograph for AANEM that may speak to this point in some form.
There are differing opinions in the literature as to whether the amplitude of fibrillation potentials can be meaningfully used in inferring the (a) duration of a lesion and (b) viability of muscle fibers. Some references of interest:
(poster #15 at 1997 AAPM&R annual meeting): Park DS, Joo MC, Lee SJ, Kim DH, Park YG. Amplitude of fibrillation potential and positive sharp wave following peripheral nerve injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1035
What does this community think? Can we glean any information from fibrillation amplitudes, in practice? Should these be used in broad strokes and with caution, quantitatively, or never at all?
How long after starting eculizumab do you usually see a clinical improvement in your myasthenia gravis patients? What’s the average and what’s the range?
45 yo man with a h/o AChR Ab positive myasthenia gravis who began to have symptoms about a year prior.
He initially presented to us on 12/4 with diplopia, ptosis, "neck pain", dysphagia, and nasal regurgitation. These were also his presenting symptoms upon initial diagnosis but he had been normal for several months without any symptoms until 9 days prior to admission. He had been taking prednisone 10 mg daily and pyridostigmine 60 mg QID plus TS 180 mg QHS at home.
Work up in his home country:
May 2022 - AChRAb 5.85 (< 0.45)
May 2022 - CT Chest - "Thymus not enlarged"
Initial exam was significant for:
Diplopia in all directions of gaze. Impaired up gaze. Ptosis - R > L - significantly worse with EOM for about 20 seconds and improved with rest for about 20 seconds. Face - orbicularis oculi weakness, B. Strong orbicularis oris. Smile - normal. Palate elevates normally. No nasal speech. Swallows 90 cc of liquid with no difficulty or coughing. NF/NE - limited due to discomfort but definite neck extension weakness. Delt 4+ and HF 4 with some fatigability. Other muscles are 5/5.
He improved and then had significant worsening again within a few days while getting IVIg.
He was later treated with plasma exchange and slightly improved and then significantly worsened.
He never had any respiratory complaints. During his stay he developed worsening dysphagia and weakness in chewing which was new.
During his stay, pyridostigmine was increased to 120 mg QID, and he was continued on TS 180mg at night. Prednisone was slowly increased to 40 mg daily. Lowering the pyridostigmine resulted in a significant worsening of all symptoms.
Work up by us:
Anti-striated muscle Ab was + 1:320.
TSH normal.
CT chest - "3.2 cm isodense lesion is noted in the prevascular space/anterior mediastinum. Primary differential diagnostic consideration includes a thymoma.
Most recent exam:
Mild bilateral orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris weakness.
No nasal speech.
Neck extension 4- --> 4
L/R Deltoid 4+ --> 5, B initially and then fatigues to 4/4 Biceps 5/5 Triceps 5/5 Wrist Extension 5/5 Wrist Flexion 5/5 Grip 5/5
finger flexion 5/5, finger extension 5/5
L/R Hip Flexion 4-/4- Knee Extension 5/5 Dorsiflexion 5/5 Plantar Flexion 5/5
All weakness is fatiguable weakness.
We are awaiting insurance approval for eculizumab.
We are obviously thinking about several factors when deciding on timing:
Since he is still having significant bulbar symptoms, we would wait.
Would you do a thymectomy soon in this patient who likely has a thymoma and has been refractory to treatment?
We will get full formal PFTs prior to considering any surgery.
Since symptomatic improvement is usually seen 6 months or more after thymectomy, there is no emergency in performing thymectomy but waiting longer has its downside also.
When would you recommend doing a thymectomy in this patient?
Hello all, I am hoping for some help with diagnosis and management from people much smarter than I am with this complicated (and long) EMG/NCS and case I encountered recently. The background is a 57 year old patient who had started lamotrigine for mood related issues. After about 2 weeks she developed diffuse hives for 4-5 days. She stopped the lamotrigine and used diphenhydramine and topical creams for treatment. She then woke up one day with trouble using her hands a day or two after the hives resolved. She also reported numbness in her hands. She had bad pain in her shoulders and upper back. The pain lasted about 2 weeks. She had Xrays of her cervical spine that showed mild degenerative changes. EMG/NCS performed prior to formal neurological consultation and about 2.5 weeks after onset of the weakness showed normal sensory responses in the bilateral median, ulnar, and radial nerves, and reduced amplitudes of the bilateral median and ulnar motor responses (right median 2.1 mV, left median 1.7 mV, right ulnar 2.1 mV, left ulnar 1.4 mV) and right radial (2.5 mV) without evidence of conduction block or LEMS and with normal distal latencies and conduction velocities. Left peroneal motor response was normal (latency of 4.5 ms and amplitude 4.7 mV). Needle exam showed a few fibs and PSWs in the bilateral FDIs and the left pronator teres. Reduced recruitment of normal units was found in the bilateral FDI, FPL, PT, EDC, and left EIP and right APB, with normal proximal muscles and paraspinals. Neuro consult performed the next day confirmed the history of an abrupt onset of symptoms (no weakness prior to the lamotrigine and hives) and found 4/5 strength in the bilateral triceps, deltoids, wrist flexion, wrist extension, 3/5 in bilateral finger abduction and flexion and 4+/5 in bilateral finger extension. Reflexes were normal throughout. Sensory exam revealed patchy decrease in temperature in the distal forearms and hands symmetrically with normal modalities otherwise. She was started on a 10 day tapering course of prednisone (60 mg for 5 days then quick taper). MRI cervical spine and brachial plexus ordered and performed about 4-5 weeks after symptom onset. These showed T2/STIR hyperintensity in the bilateral T1 and possibly right C7 without clear enhancement (though post contrast images were degraded by artifact). MRI C spine showed multilevel degenerative disc disease, C5-6 canal stenosis without cord compression and patchy T2 hyperintensity at C5-6 possibly extending to C6-7 without enhancement - radiologist opined that this could be from remote trauma from a disc herniation that resolved or from demyelination. Lab testing was unremarkable (HIV, SPEP, immunofixation, Sjogren's antibodies, ACE, light chains, celiac panel, B1, ESR, CRP, TSH, B12, CMP - ANA or ANCA were not sent). Lumbar puncture then performed - WBC -2, RBC-21, no differential performed, protein 36.5, glucose 71, negative HSV and CMV and negative gram stain and culture, oligoclonal bands were not sent. Repeat EMG/NCS performed 8 weeks after initial test (patient reported maybe very minimal improvement in subjective numbness and weakness in the right hand though exam showed no changes) showed again normal sensory responses in the arms bilaterally, left median motor amplitude 3.1 mV, right median 1.5 mV, with normal distal latencies (less than 4.4 ms), left ulnar 1.9 mV and right ulnar 3.5 mV (with minimally prolonged distal latencies 3.5-3.7 ms) and left radial 3.3 mV and right radial 3.7 mV (normal distal latencies 2.7 ms) with no evidence of conduction block or LEMS. Needle exam showed more insertional and spontaenous activity with expected neuropathic changes (larger units with polyphasia and increased duration) in the motor units in the bilateral FDI, EIP and pronator teres. Proximal muscles were normal. Repeat MRI brachial plexus is pending. I am sorry for the long presentation but this is complicated and I wanted to present as clear a picture as I could. Thank you!
Hi guys! I'm trying to see if neuromuscular ultrasound makes sense from a business perspective.
Cadwell quoted us 23K for the ultrasound software and upgrading our laptop(apparently our current laptop which we use for EMG is insufficient?).
Seems that the RVUs/Medicare reimbursement rates for 2023 are as follows:
The RVU’s and CMS reimbursement for each beginning in 2023 will be:
76881—1.56 ($51.57)
76882—1.20 ($39.67)
76883—2.15 ($71.08)
So ultimately it all depends on time, patient volume, and return.
I would like to hear from those who have had experience regarding this matter.
Thank you.
A 25 years old woman presented paresthesias in her right hand ascending to the shoulder, 20 days after her marriage (minding that she wore a traditional wedding dress that is considered heavy), few minutes later she presented sudden muscle weakness on the right upper limb, and then a gradual recovery 4 days after, without a real pain!
The NCS: All neurophysiological parameters are normal, including the lateral antebrachial cutaneous and the medial antebrachial cutaneous
In EMG: ongoing denervation (spontaneous activity +++) just in 3 muscles Deltoid, extensor communis digitorum and supinator with moderately reduced recruitment
No denervation in these muscles: biceps brachii, 1st interosseous and infraspinatus
No imaging at the moment (in progress)
note that she is thin (39kg for 1m57!) There was a bruise on the back of her shoulder! Now is it a slight trauma that she didn't pay attention to or something else, we don't know.
Note also that the incident occurred 20 days ago and it is in the recovery phase.
What do you think dear colleagues?
Do you think it is plexopathy even if all SNAPs are within normal limits or cervical radiculopathy? or maybe a Rucksack Paralysis? looking at the rapid recovery!
Thank you so much
A med student is writing a review with me on how text books describe cervical paraspinal EMG. The problem is that their med school and my solo practice don't have all the texts or the most recent versions. If anyone has any of the following (most recent edition) could you email me andyhaig@umich.edu with either a photocopy or answers to these questions? (Yeah, so far most books don't get specific, I know. )
Do they mention cervical paraspinal anatomy? what do they say?
do they mention a technique? what technique if any?
do they have a scoring system? what is it? are there norms?
What utility do they claim for cervical paraspinal EMG?
Missing most recent versions of these books:
Fishman
Pease
EMG Pearls
Binnie
Misulis
Bertorini
Dumitru
Kimura
Good Morning,
The Annual Meeting Workshop Committee received a proposal to start a new workshop on US guided lumbar puncture to be performed on a body model. I just wanted to gauge the interest of the AANEM members in the topic. Please let me know your thoughts or if you have any questions or concerns.
Hi everybody
we realised an EMG to a 14 year old girl today, presented to the Electrodiagnostic unit for muscle weakness and fatigue, she has Hodgkin lymphoma who received a chemotherapy with this OEPA scheme ( Vincristine Sulfate, Etoposide Phosphate, Prednisone, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride) she is in the fifth session now; started from august,
In the EMG we found a pure diffuse motor neuropathy, and an ongoing denervation in the abductor policis previs and anterior tibialis with poor recruitment, and very prolonged F waves in lower limbs (60ms), my question is: is it only a neuropathy induced by chemotherapy, is it described in the literature? and why sensory fibers are spared in this case?
Can neurotoxicity affect motor fibers and not sensory fibers and vice versa?
ACNS CNP Fellowship Match Townhall
Tuesday, November 29, 2022 • 7:00 - 8:00pm ET
The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) will convene another townhall meeting of Clinical Neurophysiology, Epilepsy, and Neuromuscular fellowship Program Directors on Tuesday, November 29, 2022, 7:00 – 8:00pm ET (6:00 – 7:00pm CT; 4:00 – 5:00pm PT).
The goal of this meeting is to convey information to and answer questions from programs related to options for fellowship recruitment for the 2024-25 fellowship year, including the Epilepsy Match (led by AES), the Neuromuscular Portal (administered by AANEM) and ACNS’s Fellowship Finder resource.
A tentative agenda is as follows:
7:00pm ET
Introduction to the Overall Recruitment Landscape and the ACNS Fellowship Finder Saurabh R. Sinha, MD, PhD, FACNS
7:05pm ET
Overview of the AANEM Portal Ruple Laughlin, MD, FACNS
7:15pm ET
Overview of the Epilepsy/CNP Match Sara E. Schmitt, MD, FACNS
7:25pm ET
Overview of Other Options Lynn Liu, MD, MS (HPE) FACNS
7:35pm ET
Panel Discussion
The discussion will be recorded and made available on the ACNS website, along with slides from each of the presenters.
Meeting ID: 838 0154 5776
Passcode: 353886
One tap mobile
+13017158592,,83801545776#,,,,*353886# US (Washington DC)
+13052241968,,83801545776#,,,,*353886# US
Dial by your location
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 305 224 1968 US
+1 309 205 3325 US
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
I was wondering if any of you has experience with trigeminal motor neuroconduction study using digastric muscle.
I heard about this technique but I could not find any paper nor book chapter describing it. It was cited in the context for repetitive stimulation in patients with myastenhia with bulbar symptons.
If a patient was sent to get NCS EMG by another physician on a certain date, then referring physician asks the patient to come back for full neurological work up and consultation on a different date after EMG is completed. Can you bill a new visit code like 99204 when you see the patient the second time?
I have been having issues with insurance refusing to pay a new visit code for a patient whom I had seen previously for EMG. I am forced to use a follow up codes for the patient even though I never bill for a new visit before when i see the patient for EMG.
I am interested in learning Neuromuscular ultrasound and would appreciate any advice regarding courses and equipment. I am located in New York City, so courses in the Northeast would be preferable. I have also seen some online courses, e.g. sonocampus.org. Does anyone have experience with theses?
With respect to equipment, are there specific machines, models that are preferred? I have seen ones that work with smart phones. Is their quality adequate for this purpose?
Hello everyone
I'm impressed with the cases and ultrasound discussions at this years AANEM conference. A few presenters mentioned high frequency ultrasound for better visualization of the nerve fascicles. Our office plans to purchase another ultrasound; currently we have a GE P9. Does anyone know the GE ultrasound version that is optimal for peripheral nerve visualization, specifically the high frequency option?
This is an EMG in a person in their 40s with a 3 year history of progressive weakness in their right arm. NCS and clinical exam supports a working diagnosis of an acquired demyelinating motor neuropathy. This EMG video was recorded from the pronator teres (clinically weak) at rest. He reported no pain during the study.
I recently had an young individual with a lacerated ulnar nerve at the elbow who retained good hand function, particularly of FDI. It turns out he had a HUGE Martin Gruber Anastamosis (see figure from 1 year post injury and repair) that saved his intrinsic function.
I am thinking that this redundant innervation is an evolutionary advantage. I've also heard that MGA is associated with higher levels of intelligence and good looks (unpublished observations). It's present in 20% of people. Not sure if I mentioned I personally have MGA.
What do others think? Evolutionary advantage or random mutation? Not sure I see any downsides to MGA.
Is there any situation where the fibular/peroneal CMAP and superficial fibular/peroneal SNAP can be absent normally? I was asked to evaluate a 22 y.o. for potential foot drop. he had an anoxic brain injury from an overdose with a prollonged period of low cognative and physical function, but has made a pretty profound recover. he has poor dorsiflexion of his right foot, but clinically this appears to be more related to a mild plantar flexion contracture than dorsifelxion weakness. on needle examination he had normal activity in the tibialis anterior, peroneous longus and ext. digitorm brevis. He has no sensory loss of the right calf or foot, but I was unable to obtain a fibular CMAP at the ankle, fibular head or proximal to the fibular head. At the time, I did not think to get a CMAP from the T.A. Before I bring him back to test for a fibular response to the T.A., I wanted to see if it possible to be unable to obtain a fibular response to the EDB without some sort of pathology. he did have a normal fibular CMAP on the left.
Dear Colleagues,
I am hoping to enlist your expertise in a case that is perplexing me.
23 yo M admitted for focal swelling of left forearm and pigmenturia. He had done some light upper body resistance exercises 3 days prior (10 lb dumbbells) and was sore following this. CK on admission was 14,000. MRI left forearm showed edema and enhancement in the left brachioradialis muscle only. He was hydrated and his CK came down slowly to 700 over the next week. He did not receive steroids. About 2 weeks prior to admission, his PCP noted elevated AST/ALT to 75/91 (his GGT was later normal).
I saw him 1 week after discharge. His CK at that point was 106.There was some loss of bulk in the left brachioradialis and very mild weakness of elbow flexion, but the remainder of the exam was normal. His HMGCR antibody (ARUP) was positive at 49 (normal <20). The ARUP extended myositis antibody panel was negative.
He is scheduled to get a muscle biopsy to see if he has changes consistent with necrotizing myopathy, then EMG to assess other muscles for subclinical abnormalities. Will recheck HMGCR antibody in about 3 months.
After searching the literature, I found only one case report of immune mediated necrotizing myopathy presenting focally like this. I'm not sure which is more likely - an atypical presentation of a rare disease or a false positive antibody despite a reportedly very high specificity.
My questions for this community:
1. Has anyone seen this before? Is focal-onset IMNM a reasonable conclusion?
2. If CK has returned to normal but the affected muscle remains weak, does that justify treatment with steroids? How aggressively would you treat this?
3. What kind of exercise restrictions would you recommend, if any?
Your expertise, as always, is highly valued!
Dan Simmons
I enjoy participating in the AANEM Connect Forum for a number of reasons. There are very fundamental questions posed on a frequent basis that cause me to pause and ask myself, ‘Why didn’t I think of that?’ Also, I continue to learn
new things when others contribute their thoughts and experiences. Connect is an excellent opportunity for members to interact and to address any topic, including those that may not be discussed
at an annual meeting or journal article.