Press and Media

Thank you for your coverage of the AANEM Annual Meeting. Please join us at the 2025 AANEM Annual Meeting, being held Oct.29-Nov. 1 in San Francisco, California. Journalists covering the annual meeting and posting stories on social media channels are encouraged to use the official meeting hashtag #AANEMinSanFran.
Please review the Abstract Embargo Policy. For questions regarding AANEM Annual Meeting policies, please email communications@aanem.org.

View the latest AANEM Achievement Award winners, the American Neuromuscular Foundation (ANF) Abstract Award winners, and the latest AANEM news articles on News Express.

Questions? Check out the frequently asked questions below or contact communications@aanem.org

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: When will be content of abstracts be viewable, as opposed to just the titles?
A: The abstract content will be available at the annual meeting during the Poster Hall hours. We do not provide abstract presenter information or slides ahead of time. All available information can be found in the AANEM Abstract Guide online when it becomes available.

Q: How do I reach out to abstract or session presenters for an interview?
A:
 We do not offer member contact information. To connect with abstract or session presenters, review the AANEM Annual Meeting Program when available. Find the topics of interest and connect with the presenter after their lecture or during their abstract poster session time. Currently there is no interview option for virtual attendees.

Q: When can I share information?
A: The embargo on the abstracts themselves is lifted when they have been published in Muscle & Nerve and online in the AANEM Abstract Guide. However, the additional information beyond what is in the abstract itself is still embargoed. 

AANEM requires information that goes beyond that which is contained within the abstract, e.g., the release of data not included in the abstract, discussion of the abstract done as part of a scientific presentation, etc. to be embargoed until the start of the annual meeting. Please see the Abstract Embargo Policy.

Q: Will the Abstract Award Reception feature the best posters? 
A: The Abstract Award Reception is a social hour in honor of the abstract award winners where all authors, including award winners, will be available to discuss research. 

Q: Original research is ONLY presented as posters, correct?
A: Yes - the research is presented in the Poster Hall via abstract posters.

Science News: Safety and Efficacy of Apitegromab in Nonambulatory Type 2 or Type 3 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SAPPHIRE): A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Nov 18, 2025, 13:36 by DeeDee Stiepan
This article summarizing the results of the SAPHPHIRE trial, a double blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of apitegromab (myostatin inhibitor) in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 2 and 3.

Submitted by: Elena Shanina MD, PhD
Edited by: Justin Willer, MD

Citation: Crawford, T. O., Servais, L., Mercuri, E., Kölbel, H., Kuntz, N., Finkel, R. S., Krueger, J., Batley, K., Young, S. D., Marantz, J. L., Song, G., Yao, B., Zhao, G., Rossello, J., Tirucherai, G. S., Mazzone, E. S., Butterfield, R. J., de la Banda, M. G. G., Seferian, A. M., Sansone, V. A., … SAPPHIRE Study Group (2025). Safety and efficacy of apitegromab in nonambulatory type 2 or type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SAPPHIRE): a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. Neurology, 24(9), 727–739.

Summary: 
This article summarizing the results of the SAPPHIRE trial, a double blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of apitegromab (myostatin inhibitor) in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 2 and 3. The study was conducted in 9 countries, at 48 sites, and enrolled 188 patients (156 aged 2-12 years and 32 aged 13-21 years). Patients’ Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE) scores were 10–45 at baseline, and all had received at least 10 months of nusinersen or at least 6 months of risdiplam therapy. 

Participants in 2–12 years age group were randomly assigned to receive apitegromab 20 mg/kg, apitegromab 10 mg/kg, or placebo (1:1:1) every 4 weeks by intravenous infusion; participants in 13–21 years age group randomly received apitegromab 20 mg/kg or placebo (2:1) every 4 weeks. A total of 128 participants received apitegromab and 60 received placebo. The primary endpoint of the study was the change from baseline in HFMSE at 12 months. Motor function evaluations were performed before dosing on study days 1, 57, 113, 169, 225, 281, and 365. At 12 months, the least squares mean difference in HFMSE change from baseline was 1.8 points (95% CI 0·30 to 3·32; p=0·019) for apitegromab (20 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) versus placebo (least squares mean 0·6 vs –1·2), favoring apitegromab. Motor function as measured by HFMSE, improved in patients receiving apitegromab and worsened in placebo group, despite continuing SMN-targeted therapy.

The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between apitegromab and placebo.

Comments: 
Muscle-targeting therapy is a novel approach to improve motor function in patients with SMA and overall, in neuromuscular disorders. Myostatin is important in regulating muscle mass. After decades of research, previous attempts to target myostatin were not successful due to toxic effects and lack of selectivity in the approach. 
At present, there are no approved therapies that specifically target muscle tissue in patients with either genetic or acquired neuromuscular disorders. Current treatments for SMA target motor neuron degeneration by increasing expression of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, therefore slowing disease progression. These treatments do not address the accompanying muscle atrophy. Despite SMN-targeted therapy, patients often retain functional deficits, and motor decline may continue. Apitegromab, a myostatin inhibitor, has been shown to promote muscle growth. 
This study provides level 1 evidence that apitegromab significantly improves motor function compared to placebo in nonambulatory patients with type 2 or 3 spinal muscular atrophy.

This is the first placebo-controlled clinical study to show functional benefit of selective myostatin inhibition in any disease. By selectively targeting latent myostatin precursors, apitegromab minimizes off-target effects and has favorable safety profile. 

Despite major advances in SMA therapy, non-ambulatory patients with types 2 and 3 continue to experience significant motor deficits, highlighting the ongoing need to address muscle atrophy and improve function. Given the unmet need to address muscle atrophy and early signs of ongoing motor decline with SMN-targeted therapies, the SAPPHIRE trial results are encouraging, supporting that muscle-targeted therapy can benefit people with SMA across a wide range of ages, and also potentially benefit patients with other neuromuscular disorders. 

Article of similar interest:
Crawford TO, Darras BT, Day JW, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Apitegromab in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Types 2 and 3: The Phase 2 TOPAZ Study. Neurology. 2024;102(5):e209151. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000209151