Literature Review for Electrodiagnostic Studies
in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Description:
The first AAEM Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Literature Review (1993) evaluated
the sensitivity and specificity of nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and
needle electromyography (EMG) to confirm a clinical diagnoses of (CTS)
based upon a critical review of 165 articles from the literature through
May 1991. This new report includes all of the information from the first
review and 113 additional articles from the literature through December
2000. The authors concluded that median sensory and motor NCSs are valid
and reproducible clinical laboratory studies that confirm the clinical
diagnoses of CTS with a high degree of sensitivity (>85%) and specificity
(>95%) and that the clinical practice recommendations published in
1993 remain valid. Needle EMG studies were not as sensitive or specific
as NCSs to diagnose CTS although they are useful to document axonal nerve
pathology. In future research studies to evaluate the usefulness of NCSs
and needle EMGs to diagnose CTS, the authors recommend that (1) the physician
performing and interpreting the NCS and needle EMGs be blinded to the
diagnosis of the subjects (normal, CTS patient, or disease control) to
avoid observer bias and (2) the clinical diagnosis of CTS be made according
to a new set of consensus clinical diagnostic criteria presented in this
report to provide a more uniform population of CTS patients.
Key words: carpal tunnel syndrome;
electromyography; literature review; nerve conduction study; reference
values; sensitivity; specificity
Full Text: Go
to Full Article (PDF)
Available for
CME to Members only. Login and
select Online CME. |